• INDUSTRIES
  • SERVICES
  • FDA REQUIREMENTS
  • NEWS & MEDIA
  • BLOG
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • SHOP

* You are viewing Posts Tagged ‘prop 65’

Will Prop 65 Kill Off BPA Forever? Second Time’s a Charm

admin February 04, 2013 Food, Law & Regulatory No Comments

Tags: allowable, baby bottles, BPA, California, chemicals, dose, foods, intent to list, level, MADL, maximum, OEHHA, plastics, prop 65, warning

Prop 65 Monster BPA

California’s Prop 65 monster must be fed and this time it has set its hungry sights on BPA, the notorious chemical used in the production of plastics and epoxy resins for food and drink packaging.  If listed, companies using BPA should consider phasing out their inventories, transitioning to different food storage containers and making their supply chains and foreign suppliers aware/compliant as well.  You may remember BPA from past controversies involving infant formulas and baby bottles but now BPA is back in the news as California’s … READ MORE

Google+FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponPinterestLinkedInShare

Prop 37: A Two-Edged Sword for Small Businesses

admin October 08, 2012 Food, Law & Regulatory No Comments

Tags: all-natural, California, certification, enforcement, GMO, industry, labeling, litigation, non-gmo, NOP, organics, products, Prop 37, prop 65, small business, usda

GMO Labeling Prop 37

The advent of Prop 37 portends great things for the small business organic and natural food industry, which has been forced until now to compete with big corporate agriculture. Prop 37 exempts from GMO labeling any food that is certified organic under the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Organics Program (NOP). It also exempts food that is certified GMO-free by an independent organization approved by the State of California. Thus, Prop 37 rewards organic producers and distributors that follow … READ MORE

Google+FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponPinterestLinkedInShare

FDAImports.com Assists Companies with Prop 65, Safe Cosmetics Act and California Compliance and Litigation Defense in New Irvine, California Office

admin August 02, 2012 Company News, Cosmetics, Food, Law & Regulatory No Comments

Tags: California, California Safe Cosmetics Act, Consumer Protection Marketing Strategies, defense, FDA, fdaimports.com, litigation, mitigation, OEHHA, offices, prop 65, Proposition 65, risk, rules

California Litigation Defense

In addition to its corporate headquarters near Baltimore, Maryland, FDA consulting firm, FDAImports.com has opened another office in Irvine, California in an effort to assist current and future clients with the challenges stemming from California’s unique regulatory and legal environment. The State of California, with its 37 million consumers, is a lucrative marketplace for both domestic and international companies, a marketplace that holds as much challenge as opportunity due to the complex rules found in Proposition 65, the California Safe Cosmetics Act and California’s Unfair … READ MORE

Google+FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponPinterestLinkedInShare

Prop 65 Press Releases Are Blood in the Water for California Plaintiff’s Attorneys

admin April 30, 2012 Cosmetics, Law & Regulatory No Comments

Tags: birth defects, blood, California, California Department of Toxic Substances Control, California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, cancer, cosmetics, Dibutyl Phthalate, DTSC, FDA Warning Letter, Formaldehyde, JAWS, labeling, nail polish, OEHHA, prop 65, Proposition 65, sharks, Toluene

Prop 65 Press Releases Are Blood in the Water

Cue the soundtrack from Jaws.

Earlier this month, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) issued a press release alleging that several nail polish manufacturers failed to declare the presence of potentially dangerous cosmetic ingredients, Toluene, Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP) and Formaldehyde. DTSC based its allegations on initial testing of 25 different cosmetic brands, chosen at random. The investigation also revealed that many of the brands failed to declare these ingredients even though their labeling explicitly stated they were free of these chemicals.

California authorities … READ MORE

Google+FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponPinterestLinkedInShare


  • Get our blog in your inbox


     



  • Topics

    • China (31)
    • Company News (73)
    • Cosmetics (30)
    • Dietary Supplements (12)
    • Drugs (17)
    • Events (16)
    • Food (101)
    • Food Safety Modernization Act (46)
    • Humor (10)
    • Imports (55)
    • Law & Regulatory (122)
    • Medical Devices (15)
    • Uncategorized (4)
    • USDA (3)
  • Archives

-->

© 2013 FDAImports.com, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
810 Landmark Drive, Suite 126  |  Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061  |  ph: (410) 220-2800  |  fx: (443) 583-1464
FDAImports.com, LLC is a private FDA regulatory consulting firm and is not the FDA

Privacy Policy  |  Disclaimer  |  Sitemap  |  Glossary  |  Choose Your Language